成绩相关 Grade descriptors

成绩 分数 学分
通过 A+ 90-100 9
A 85-89 8
A- 80-84 7
B+ 75-79 6
B 70-74 5
B- 65-69 4
C+ 60-64 3
C 55-59 2
C- 50-54 1
不及格 D+ 45-49 0
D 40-44 0
D- 0-39 0

查看原文

特殊情况规定 Aegrotat or compassionate consideration

Apply for an aegrotat or compassionate consideration if your personal circumstances are temporary and have significantly affected your test or exam performance or preparation.

查看原文

特殊情况指的是学生发生不可控制的重大事件,且其严重影响到了学生的学习表现或参加考试的能力。学生可以以此进行特殊情况申请,来获得重考或延期的机会。

学术不诚信类型 Academic misconduct

学术不诚信行为包括但不限于:

# 原文 Policy wording 释义
1 Using the work of others without adequate acknowledgement and referencing (“adequate attribution”), that is, plagiarism. This includes: use of other people’s data without adequate attribution; use of published or unpublished expressions and ideas from other people without adequate attribution; use of published or unpublished tables, figures, and diagrams without adequate attribution. To avoid doubt, where the principles of academic integrity require that certain material be cited as a quotation within quotation marks (i.e. because the material has been reproduced in verbatim or nearly verbatim form), referencing it as though it had been paraphrased does not constitute adequate attribution. 使用他人作品却未充分注明出处与引用(即“抄袭”)。包括:未充分注明而使用他人的数据;未充分注明而使用他人已发表或未发表的表述与观点;未充分注明而使用已发表或未发表的表格、图表与图示。需注意,凡按学术诚信原则应以引号作为引文标注的材料(即逐字或近乎逐字复制的内容),若按转述方式标注则不构成充分注明出处。
2 Copying from another student’s work (with or without their knowledge). 抄袭其他学生的作业(无论对方是否知情)。
3 Using coursework that had been submitted previously at any educational institution by the student. 使用本人此前已在任何教育机构提交过的课业。
4 Submitting the same, or a substantially similar, assignment or piece of research for more than one assessment. 将相同或实质相似的作业或研究成果用于多个评估的提交。
5 Submitting for assessment work that has been produced, all or in part, by unauthorised collaboration with one or more other individuals. (Note: See Third Party Assistance in Undergraduate and Postgraduate Coursework Guidelines.) 提交全部或部分由与一名或多名他人未经授权合作完成的评估作业。(注:参见《本科与研究生课业指南》中“第三方协助”部分。)
6 Submitting for assessment material obtained from commercial providers (also known as “contract cheating”). 提交从商业机构获取的评估材料(即“代写/合同作弊”)。
7 Impersonation or arranging to have someone impersonate you or someone else during the performance of academic work or any examination. 冒名顶替,或安排他人在学术工作或任何考试中冒充你或他人。
8 Cheating during tests or examinations by using software, websites, materials or devices not explicitly permitted by the examiner. 在测验或考试中使用考官未明确允许的软件、网站、材料或设备作弊。
9 Misrepresenting disability, temporary illness or injury, or exceptional circumstances beyond the student’s control, and then claiming special conditions and/or special consideration. 谎报残疾、临时疾病或受伤,或超出本人控制范围的特殊情况,并以此申请特殊条件和/或特殊情况照顾。
10 Misrepresenting or presenting false or misleading information in application for course credit or for provisions around research work. 在课程学分申请或研究工作相关事项中提供虚假或误导性信息。
11 Claiming results that have not been obtained. 声称取得了实际并未取得的结果/成绩。
12 The fabrication or falsification of data, including changing research records. 伪造或篡改数据,包括更改研究记录。
13 Misleading ascription of authorship, including failing to acknowledge work primarily produced by any other person. 错误标注作者署名,包括未致谢主要由他人完成的工作。
14 A breach of a duty of confidentiality, privacy or the terms of any ethical approvals. 违反保密、隐私义务或任何伦理审批条款。
15 Interference, including taking, sequestering or materially damaging any research-related material of another researcher intentionally and without authorisation, including the apparatus, reagents, biological materials, writings, data, hardware, software, or any other substance or device used or produced in the conduct of research. 干扰行为,包括故意且未经授权地拿取、扣留或实质性损坏其他研究人员的研究相关材料,包括研究中使用或产出的仪器、试剂、生物材料、文稿、数据、硬件、软件或其他任何物品或设备。
16 Other misbehaviours in specific disciplines including breaches of the Code of Conduct for Research, and relevant professional practices and codes of ethics. This includes, but is not limited to, departing from protocols approved by the University in the course of human or animal experimentation, behavioural standards whilst on clinical assignment or similar course or programme placements. 特定学科中的其他不当行为,包括违反《研究行为准则》及相关专业操守与伦理守则。包括但不限于在人体或动物实验过程中偏离学校批准的方案,以及在临床实习或类似课程/项目实习中违反行为规范。
17 Assisting a student to do any of the above. 协助他人进行上述任一行为。

查看原文

学术不诚信惩罚 Academic penalty

学术不诚信的惩罚视情节轻重分为三类——轻微学术不诚信、考试中的一类学术不诚信、严重学术不诚信及考试中的二类学术不诚信,可处以下列处罚:

# 原文 Policy wording 释义
1 Reduction of the mark for the piece of work to which the academic misconduct refers, down to and including a mark of zero; or not marking the piece of work, thus giving it a mark of zero. (轻微学术不诚信)将相关作业的分数降低,最低可至零分;或不予评分,即记为零分。
2 Reduction of the student’s final grade for the course by up to three grade steps. (轻微学术不诚信)将学生该课程的最终成绩降低最多三个等级。
3 An oral or written reprimand. (轻微学术不诚信)口头或书面训诫。
4 Reduction of the mark for the examination, down to and including a mark of zero; or not marking the examination, thus giving it a mark of zero. (考试中一类学术不诚信)将考试分数降低,最低可至零分;或不予评分,即记为零分。
5 Reduction of the student’s final grade for the course by up to three grade steps. (考试中一类学术不诚信)将学生该课程的最终成绩降低最多三个等级。
6 An oral or written reprimand. (考试中一类学术不诚信)口头或书面训诫。
7 Reduction of the grade for the piece of work to which the academic misconduct refers, down to and including a grade of zero, or not marking the piece of work, thus giving it a grade of zero. (严重学术不诚信及考试中二类学术不诚信)将相关作业的成绩降低,最低可至零分等级;或不予评分,即记为零分等级。
8 Reduction of the student’s grade for the course, down to and including a grade of ‘Fail’. (严重学术不诚信及考试中二类学术不诚信)将学生该课程的成绩降低,最低可至“不及格”。
9 An oral or written reprimand. (严重学术不诚信及考试中二类学术不诚信)口头或书面训诫。
10 A fine not exceeding $1,000. (严重学术不诚信及考试中二类学术不诚信)处以不超过1,000元的罚款。
11 Suspend attendance at the University for a period to be determined. (严重学术不诚信及考试中二类学术不诚信)在一定期限内停学。
12 Cancel enrolment, i.e., expulsion from the University. (严重学术不诚信及考试中二类学术不诚信)取消学籍,即开除/退学。

查看原文

申诉流程 Appeal

学生若对相关决定不满,可按学校的学术争议与投诉流程处理:

  1. 非正式解决:首先直接与相关任课老师、课程协调员或专业顾问沟通,这通常更快捷、压力更小(学生可携带支持人,AUSA Advocacy 亦可全程提供协助)。
  2. 正式投诉:以书面形式向相关学术负责人(Academic Head)提出投诉,须清楚说明事项并附全部证据,提交后不可再补充或更改;多名学生可就同一事项联合提交。调查可能需要最多 28 天(尤其在情况复杂时)。学术负责人会作出初步裁定并提出解决方案,随后由院长(Dean)作出最终决定——全部或部分支持投诉并给出处理方案,或驳回投诉。
  3. 复核:若学生仍不满,可请求教务长(Provost)进行复核。复核不会重新调查,仅审查流程是否存在失误、或院长的决定是否明显与证据不符。教务长的决定为最终决定。

查看原文