成绩相关 Grade descriptors
| 分数 | 评级 |
|---|---|
| 70 - 100 | 一等 |
| 60 - | 二等一 |
| 50 - 59 | 二等二 |
| 40 - 49 | 三等 |
| 0 - 39 | 不及格 |
特殊情况规定 Exceptional Circumstances
Circumstances acceptable under this policy must be exceptional (i.e. serious and unusual) relative to the normal daily challenges that academic study presents, and unpredictable in that you could not reasonably have been expected either to avoid them, or to allow for them in planning the assessment work or preparation. For example, it is recognised that the assessment process itself can cause students to be more anxious or stressed than at other times of the academic year, and this should be considered to be one of the normal challenges that academic study presents. Therefore, such responses would not be considered as a valid exceptional circumstance, with the exception of a very small number of cases, where the impact is serious and incapacitating.
If you believe that your performance in an assessment has been affected by unforeseen circumstances that were outside of your control, you can make a claim to have these circumstances considered.
特殊情况指必须是对学术研究正常进行产生挑战的事情并且不可预测。可以用此来申请作业或考试的延期和重交。
学术不诚信类型 Academic misconduct
学术不诚信类型包括:
| # | 原文 Policy wording | 释义 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Plagiarism – the presentation of ideas, material, or scholarship sourced from the work of another individual, group or entity without sufficient acknowledgement. | 剽窃:将其他个人、团体的思想和学术成果作为自己的展示 |
| 2 | Collusion between students taking the same assessment – is the process whereby two or more students work together – without official approval – and share ideas, solutions or material in work submitted for assessment. | 共谋:两个或以上学生未经允许共同完成工作 |
| 3 | (a)Breach and/or (b)Cheating – failure to comply with the rules of an assessment e.g. unauthorised access to materials in a closed assessment/ use of software in open assessment which has been specifically prohibited in the assessment specifications/ breaches of ethical rules relating to an assessment/ misrepresentation of word counts. (For guidance go to section 1.3.17 and 2.1.2). | 违规/作弊:未按考核规则执行,例如闭卷考核中未经授权获取材料、开卷考核中使用被明令禁止的软件、违反考核相关的道德规则、谎报字数 |
| 4 | Commission and incorporation – to seek to gain advantage by incorporating material in work submitted for assessment that has been improved by, or commissioned, purchased or obtained from, a third party e.g. family members, friends, essay mills or other students not taking the same assessment. | 代写:为获取优势,将由第三方(如家人、朋友、论文工厂或未参加同一考核的其他学生)改进、代写、购买或获取的材料纳入所提交的考核作业中 |
| 5 | Fabrication – to seek to gain advantage by incorporating falsified or fabricated material or data in work submitted for assessment or publication. | 捏造:为获取优势,在提交考核或发表的作业中加入伪造或编造的材料或数据 |
| 6 | Personation – one, or both of, a) to produce work for another student with the reasonable expectation that the incorporation of that work is intended to deceive an examiner, such as students providing material to commercial assignment writing services, b) to appear as another student in an assessment(s). | 代考/冒名:a) 为他人完成作业且预期其用于欺骗考官(如向商业代写机构提供材料),b) 冒充他人参加考核 |
| 7 | Deception – presenting fabricated or misleading evidence to gain advantage in assessment arrangements (e.g. exceptional circumstances affecting assessment), in making research proposals or providing false evidence of qualifications. | 欺骗:为在考核安排(如影响考核的特殊情况)中获取优势、在提出研究提案时,提供伪造或误导性证据,或提供虚假的资格证明 |
| 8 | Unethical research behaviour – unethical behaviour in the undertaking of research or in seeking funding e.g. including failure to obtain appropriate permission to conduct research, unauthorised use of information which was acquired confidentially, failure to acknowledge work conducted in collaboration, fraud or misuse of research funds or equipment. | 不道德的研究行为:在开展研究或申请经费过程中的不道德行为,例如未取得适当的研究许可、擅自使用保密获取的信息、未致谢合作完成的工作、骗取或滥用研究经费或设备 |
学术不诚信惩罚 Academic penalty
学术不诚信的惩罚包括但不限于:
- 警告
- 重新提交
- 扣除一定分数
- 课程不及格
- 停学或开除
申诉流程 Appeal
学生需要在决定作出后的28天(自然日)内提起正式上诉(Formal Stage Appeal)。学校会在收到上诉后进行调查,调查后回给与学生结果。如果学生对此结果不满,可以在收到结果通知后的10个工作日内提起上诉复审(Review Stage Appeal)。
